أنشطة واجتماعات مجلس الإدارة
Approved Resolutions | Special Meeting of the ICANN Board 8 February 2021
The originally published version of this document contained information that was withheld from publication in accordance with the ICANN Publication Practices. The updated information can be found at Main Agenda Item 2.a. To view a redacted or previously withheld version, please see https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/board-materials-redaction-archive-register.
-
Consent Agenda:
-
Approval of Minutes
Resolved (2021.02.08.01), the Board approves the minutes of the 30 November 2020 Special Meeting of the ICANN Board, the 17 December 2020 Special Meeting of the ICANN Board, and the 14 January 2021 Special Meeting of the ICANN Board.
-
FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget
Whereas, the draft FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget was posted for public comment in accordance with the Bylaws on 08 October 2020.
Whereas, comments received through the public comment process were reviewed and responded to and provided to the BFC members for review and comment.
Whereas, all public comments have been taken into consideration, and where appropriate and feasible, have been incorporated and a final FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget.
Whereas, per the Bylaws, the IANA Operating Plan and Budget is to be adopted by the Board and then posted on the ICANN website.
Resolved (2021.02.08.02), the Board adopts the FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget.
Rationale for Resolution 2021.02.08.02
In accordance with Section 22.4 of the ICANN Bylaws, the Board is to adopt an annual IANA budget and publish it on the ICANN website. On 08 October 2020 drafts of the FY22 PTI Operating Plan and Budget and the FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget were posted for public comment. The PTI Board approved the PTI Budget on 13 January 2021, and the PTI Budget was received as input into the FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget.
The draft FY22 PTI Operating Plan and Budget and the draft FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget were based on numerous discussions with members of ICANN org and the ICANN Community, including extensive consultations with ICANN Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and other stakeholder groups throughout the prior several months.
All comments received in all manners were considered in relation to the FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget. Where feasible and appropriate these inputs have been incorporated into the final FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget proposed for adoption.
Adopting the FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget will have a positive impact on ICANN in that it provides a proper framework by which the IANA services will be performed, which also provides the basis for the organization to be held accountable in a transparent manner.
This decision is in the public interest and within ICANN's mission, as it is fully consistent with ICANN's strategic and operational plans, and the results of which in fact allow ICANN to satisfy its mission.
This decision will have a fiscal impact on ICANN and the Community as is intended. This should have a positive impact on the security, stability and resiliency of the domain name system (DNS) with respect to any funding that is dedicated to those aspects of the DNS.
This is an Organizational Administrative Function that has already been subject to public comment as noted above.
-
Committee Membership
Whereas, the Board Governance Committee (BGC) is responsible for "[c]reating and recommending to the full Board for approval a slate of nominees for Board Chair, Board Vice Chair, Chair and membership of each Board Committee, including filling any vacancies which may occur in these positions during the year; and overseeing the creation and membership of Board Working Groups and Board Caucuses."
Whereas, in this capacity, the BGC has recommended that Danko Jevtović no longer serve on the Board Audit Committee and that he be added to the Board Strategic Planning Committee.
Resolved (2021.02.08.03), the Board approves the change in membership of the Board Audit Committee and Board Strategic Planning Committee as recommended by the BGC.
Rationale for Resolution 2021.02.08.03
Article 7, Section 7.2 and Article 14 of the ICANN Bylaws call for the Board to appoint the Board Chair, Board Vice Chair, and chairmanship and membership of each Board Committee, including filling any vacancies which may occur in these positions during the year.
As part of its responsibilities, the BGC is tasked with "[c]reating and recommending to the full Board for approval a slate of nominees for Board Chair, Board Vice Chair, Chair and membership of each Board Committee, including filling any vacancies which may occur in these positions during the year; and overseeing the creation and membership of Board Working Groups and Board Caucuses." (BGC Charter, Sec. II.C.)
In this role, the BGC recently assessed the membership of Board Committees and Danko Jevtović has agreed to step down from the Board Audit Committee and be added to the Board Strategic Planning Committee.
The appointment of Board Committee membership is consistent with ICANN's Mission and is in the public interest as it is important to ensure that the Board and its Committees have the properly skilled expertise to carry forth ICANN's Mission, Commitments and Core Values. This decision will have no direct fiscal impact on the organization and no impact on the security, stability or resiliency of the domain name system.
This decision is an Organizational Administrative Function that does not require public comment.
-
-
Main Agenda:
-
Delegation of the ישראל. ("Israel") domain in Hebrew script to the Israel Internet Association
Resolved (2021.02.08.04), as part of the exercise of its responsibilities under the IANA Naming Function Contract with ICANN, IANA has reviewed and evaluated the request to delegate the ישראל. top-level domain to the Israel Internet Association. The documentation demonstrates that the proper procedures were followed in evaluating the request.
Rationale for Resolutions 2021.02.08.04
Why the Board is addressing the issue now?
In accordance with the IANA Naming Function Contract, PTI, in the performance of the IANA Naming Function (IANA), has evaluated a request for ccTLD delegation and is presenting its report to the Board for review. This review by the Board is intended to ensure that the proper procedures were followed.
What is the proposal being considered?
The proposal is to approve a request to create the ישראל. country-code top-level domain in Hebrew script and assign the role of manager to the Israel Internet Association.
Which stakeholders or others were consulted?
In the course of evaluating a delegation application, IANA consulted with the applicant and other interested parties. As part of the application process, the applicant needs to describe consultations that were performed within the country concerning the ccTLD, and their applicability to their local Internet community.
What concerns or issues were raised by the community?
IANA is not aware of any significant issues or concerns raised by the community in relation to this request. One party objected to the request and indicated its own intention to apply for delegation. The objector was invited to submit an alternative request but has not provided a timely response that could be assessed against the evaluation criteria. The policy does not provide a basis to delay evaluation of this request based on the potential for an alternate request, the first fully-qualified application is eligible to proceed on its individual merits. The service level agreements in the IANA Naming Functions contract also require the timely evaluation and implementation of qualified requests.
What significant materials did the Board review?
The Board reviewed the following evaluations:
- The top-level domain is eligible for delegation, as the string has been deemed an appropriate representation of Israel through the ICANN Fast Track String Selection process, and Israel is presently listed in the ISO 3166-1 standard.
- The relevant government has been consulted and does not object;
- The proposed manager and its contacts agree to their responsibilities for managing this domain;
- The proposal has demonstrated appropriate local Internet community consultation and support;
- The proposal does not contravene any known laws or regulations;
- The proposal ensures the domain is managed locally in the country, and is bound under local law;
- The proposed manager has confirmed they will manage the domain in a fair and equitable manner;
- The proposed manager has demonstrated appropriate operational and technical skills and plans to operate the domain;
- The proposed technical configuration meets the technical conformance requirements;
- No specific risks or concerns relating to Internet stability have been identified; and
- Staff have provided a recommendation that this request be implemented based on the factors considered.
These evaluations are responsive to the appropriate criteria and policy frameworks, such as "Domain Name System Structure and Delegation" (RFC 1591), "GAC Principles and Guidelines for the Delegation and Administration of Country Code Top Level Domains" and the ccNSO "Framework of Interpretation of current policies and guidelines pertaining to the delegation and redelegation of country-code Top Level Domain Names."
As part of the process, Delegation and Transfer reports are posted at http://www.iana.org/reports.
What factors the Board found to be significant?
The Board did not identify any specific factors of concern with this request.
Are there positive or negative community impacts?
The timely approval of country-code domain name managers that meet the various public interest criteria is positive toward ICANN's overall mission, the local communities to which country- code top-level domains are designated to serve, and responsive to obligations under the IANA Naming Function Contract.
Are there financial impacts or ramifications on ICANN (strategic plan, operating plan, budget); the community; and/or the public?
The administration of country-code delegations in the DNS root zone is part of the IANA functions, and the delegation action should not cause any significant variance on pre-planned expenditure. It is not the role of ICANN to assess the financial impact of the internal operations of country-code top-level domains within a country.
Are there any security, stability or resiliency issues relating to the DNS?
ICANN does not believe this request poses any notable risks to security, stability or resiliency. This is an organizational administrative function not requiring public comment.
-
Board Committee and Leadership Selection Procedures
Whereas, the Board Governance Committee has reviewed and recommended revisions to the Board Committee and Leadership Selection Procedures so that they align with current practices.
Resolved (2021.02.08.05), the revised Board Committee and Leadership Selection Procedures are approved.
Rationale for Resolution 2021.02.08.05
As part of its responsibilities, the BGC is tasked with "[c]reating and recommending to the full Board for approval a slate of nominees for Board Chair, Board Vice Chair, Chair and membership of each Board Committee, including filling any vacancies which may occur in these positions during the year; and overseeing the creation and membership of Board Working Groups and Board Caucuses." (BGC Charter, Sec. II.C.)
In this role, the BGC has recommended, and the Board agrees, that Board approve revisions to the Board Committee and Leadership Selection Procedures, to align those Procedures with current selection practices.
The action is consistent with ICANN's mission and is in the public interest as it is important to ensure that procedures for Board Committee and leadership selection are up to date and reflect current practices. This decision will have no direct fiscal impact on the organization and no impact on the security, stability or resiliency of the domain name system.
This decision is an Organizational Administrative Function that does not require public comment.
-
AOB
No Resolutions taken.
-
-
Executive Session:
-
President and CEO Compensation
Whereas, it is essential to ICANN's operations that ICANN offer competitive compensation packages for its personnel.
Whereas, independent market data provided by outside expert compensation consultants indicates that current and proposed increase to compensation for the President and CEO, is below or within ICANN's target of the 50th to 75th percentile for total cash compensation based on comparable market data for the respective position.
Whereas, the Compensation Committee has recommended that that the Board approve the proposed Board resolution set out below.
Whereas, each Board member has confirmed that they are not conflicted with respect to compensation package for ICANN's President and CEO.
Resolved (2021.02.08.06), the Board approves an increase in the President and CEO's base salary for FY21 in the amount of 5% effective 1 July 2020, which pursuant to resolution 2020.10.07.02, does not require an amendment to the President and CEO's Executive Services Agreement.
Rationale for Resolution 2021.02.08.06
The goal of ICANN organization's compensation program is to provide a competitive compensation package. The organization's general compensation philosophy is to pay base salaries within a range of the 50th to 75th percentile of the market for a particular position.
The President and CEO was engaged effective May 2016. At that time, he was offered and accepted a base salary and eligibility for an additional 30% of at-risk compensation. In the nearly five years since he began his term at ICANN, the President and CEO has received one increase (of 3% effective 1 July 2019), and no change to his potential at-risk compensation percentage.
ICANN retained the services of Willis Towers Watson to study comparable compensation in the relevant comparable marketplace for the President and CEO. That market comparable data for this position consists of a blend from one or more of three sources – Non-Profits, General Industry (as reported in Willis Towers Watson and Mercer surveys), and High Technology (as reported in Radford surveys).
The comparable compensation data indicate that the President and CEO's current potential total annual cash compensation is below the lower target of 50% in nearly all possible blends presented in the Willis Towers Watson study. Accordingly, the Board has determined that an adjustment to bring the President and CEO's base compensation closer to ICANN's target compensation is necessary.
Based upon the above compensation data, considering the quality performance of the President and CEO, and all of the activities and initiatives set out in the Five-Year Strategic and Operating plan calling for continued quality senior leadership, it is necessary for the President and CEO's compensation to be reviewed and aligned with the market. Accordingly, the Board has approved a 5% increase to the President and CEO's base salary, which the Board has determined is entirely reasonable given all of the above, including the comparable market study provided by the experts. Even with this increase, the President and CEO's total cash compensation will still be below ICANN's target range for compensation in most cases. In that light, the Compensation Committee has also agreed to commission further expert reports and consider additional compensation adjustments in upcoming review periods to ensure the President and CEO's compensation is in line with ICANN org's target compensation levels.
The salary adjustment provided under this resolution will assist the organization in fulfilling its mission and in ensuring ICANN acts in the public interest in light of the desire to ensure ICANN engages the best qualified people for its leadership positions.
There will be some fiscal impact to the organization, but that impact has been anticipated within the FY21 budget. This resolution will not have any direct impact on the security, stability and resiliency of the domain name system.
This is an Organizational Administrative function that does not require public comment.
-
Additional information published on 6 June 2024
Published on 9 February 2021