Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
本内容仅提供以下语言版本
Submissions for this Proceeding
ccNSO Proposed Policy on the Retirement of ccTLDs
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
This policy is relevant to BC members with domains in a retiring ccTLD, and for prevention of DNS Abuse arising from a defunct ccTLD.
In our comment, the BC notes 7 points regarding the proposed policy.
Submission Summary:
Please find attached (PDF) the ALAC Statement on the ccNSO Proposed Policy on the Retirement of ccTLDs.
Ratification information is included on the cover page.
Kind Regards,
ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
Website: atlarge.icann.org
Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge
Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge
Submission Summary:
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) supports the proposed policy on the retirement of ccTLDs and commends the ccNSO and the ccPDP3 working group for their efforts in this respect.
Submission Summary:
While the Policy generally seems to be reasonable and elaborated, I have to point out the following issue. I believe, that in order to avoid ambiguities in interpretations of the Policy on the Retirement of ccTLDs in future, an addition should be made to paragraph No.3 “Applicability of the Policy”, which will clearly define, that a Triggering Event may only mean events, that will have occurred AFTER the adoption of the Policy. In other words,......