Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
No.
The table of contents seems not to reflect the correct page numbers. For example, it says:
2.3.19 Latin LGR Proposal Review 22
But the Section 2.3.19 is not no page 22 but on page 24.
Apart from the minor formality (page numbers in the Table of Contents) I did not find any issues and I'm fine with this version of the RZ-LGR.