Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
هذا المحتوى متوفر فقط باللغة (أو اللغات)
While RySG supports all GGP recommendations as written, we believe the report does not give all implementation guidance that ICANN Org will need to structure the Applicant Support Program in a more effective way compared to the 2012 program. Charter questions/tasks were all answered, but whether additional tasks or a vehicle other than a GGP could have delivered a suitable outcome, will be up to the GNSO Council to assess in its continuous management of the policy process. For now, we strongly suggest this item gets into the SubPro IRT agenda sooner rather than later, since this program is in the critical path of subsequent procedures. We also believe that bringing outside expertise to help in the program implementation could increase its likelihood of success, for a definition of success that the GGP established.
While RySG supports all GGP recommendations as written, we believe the report does not give all implementation guidance that ICANN Org will need to structure the Applicant Support Program in a more effective way compared to the 2012 program. Charter questions/tasks were all answered, but whether additional tasks or a vehicle other than a GGP could have delivered a suitable outcome, will be up to the GNSO Council to assess in its continuous management of the policy process. For now, we strongly suggest this item gets into the SubPro IRT agenda sooner rather than later, since this program is in the critical path of subsequent procedures. We also believe that bringing outside expertise to help in the program implementation could increase its likelihood of success, for a definition of success that the GGP established.