|
| |
 |
Message
from Ross Rader to Christine Russo
(20 April 2001)
Posted: 27 August 2001
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: 20 April, 2001 2:48 PM
To: Christine Russo
Cc: Dan Halloran; Jack Kerins; Brenda Lazare; Tim Denton; Elliot Noss;
Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org; Ross Rader
Subject: Register.com RL&A Violations
Copy via courier
Dear Ms. Russo;
Over the past few months,
Tucows has grown aware of increasingly large numbers of inbound transfer
requests failing from Register.com (relative to other registrars). Upon
further investigation, we discovered that this firm specifically requires
that their clients affirmatively acknowledge a transfer of registrars
prior to releasing the name to Tucows. If the registrant does not provide
a confirmation to Register.com of their intent to transfer their business
within a short period of time, Register.com will consistently deny the
transfer request.
We have engaged Register.com
in discussions with the goal of coming to an agreeable settlement on
this matter, but we have failed to achieve a satisfactory outcome.
Tucows finds these tactics
vexatious, anti-competitive and contrary to the terms of Exhibit B,
Policy on Transfer of Sponsorship of Registrations Between Registrars,
which is a part of the NSI-Registrar License and Agreement.
The terms of Exhibit B are
reproduced for your convenience as an appendix to this letter.
It is evident from a reading
of the set of rules that they were designed to facilitate the easy transfer
of a registrant's business from one registrar to another. The rules
clearly establish that
1. It is the obligation
of the gaining registrar to obtain the authorization from the SLD
holder, and not the losing registrar;
2. The form of the authorization
is at the discretion of each gaining registrar, not the losing registrar;
3. Denials of transfers
by the losing registrar must take a certain form, namely: "the
Registrar of record shall notify the prospective gaining Registrar
that the request was denied and the reason for the denial."
Register.com is neither
qualifying its actions nor justifying them in terms consistent with
the rules of Exhibit B.
Qualifying the actions of
Register.com presents some difficulty, because either they are, or are
not, officially denying the request for a transfer. Suppose for a moment
that Register.com is not officially denying a transfer, but rather is
engaged in an unofficial and unauthorized process designed to prevent
transfers by making them as confusing as possible to registrants. This
is a plausible description of their behaviour. To deny a transfer one
must provide reasons, such as, for instance, confusion as to the identity
of the authorizing registrant. As a matter of fact, Register.com is
making no claim about confusion as to the identity of the authorizing
registrant, nor do they provide any other reason that might justify
a denial of the request. Their behavior is unjustified, irregular, not
in compliance with Exhibit B, and clearly designed to delay, annoy,
or prevent a transfer away from them to a commercial rival.
If Register.com is denying
a request, it is obliged to obey the following rule:
"In those instances
when the Registrar of record denies the requested change of Registrar,
the Registrar of record shall notify the prospective gaining Registrar
that the request was denied and the reason for the denial."
Register.com consistently
fails to justify its actions as denials, or as anything else, and to
provide reasons for these denials.
The rules further stipulate:
Instances when the requested
change of sponsoring Registrar may be denied include, but are not
limited to:
1) Situations described
in the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
2) A pending bankruptcy
of the SLD Holder
3) Dispute over the identity
of the SLD Holder
4) Request to transfer
sponsorship occurs within the first 60 days after the initial registration
with the Registrar
In all cases, the losing
Registrar shall respond to the e-mail notice regarding the "transfer"
request within five (5) days. Failure to respond will result in a
default "approval" of the "transfer."
These provisions support
the view that the rules are designed to facilitate transfers, since
the gaining registrar need do nothing and the transfer will be approved
by default. The insertion by Register.com of a superfluous scheme of
verification of the authority to transfer is designed to frustrate the
clear intention of the rules in Exhibit B, which is to make transfers
as easy as possible.
The inserted text is a sample
of the messages that registrants are receiving from Register.com.
--- Begin Transfer
Acknowledgement Request Sample from register.com ---
Subject: Your Registrar
Transfer Request Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:11:19 -0500 From: customersupport@register.com
To: <customername>
This message is to
confirm your request to transfer the registrar for the domain name(s)
below from register.com to another registrar. We hope you'll reconsider
and renew your domain name with register.com for an additional year
for only $12!
Please click the link
below each domain name to renew your registration.
<domainname>
https://secure.register.com/renewals/?_crypt_=7494875e5e7e7e6818c81948a84f63
74f7adf84728487d8a819398483938483e
Don't miss out on
the benefits register.com is committed to provide you, including:
SUPERIOR CUSTOMER
SERVICE. Customer service is of paramount importance at register.com,
and our goal is to help our customers with their domain name needs
every step of the way, 24 hours a day.
EASY MANAGEMENT of
all aspects of your online presence. With our Domain Manager, you
can make changes to your Web site and account whenever you want
to!
CUTTING EDGE TOOLS
AND SERVICES. We are continually developing products to meet your
growing domain name needs. Your success is our goal! With every
domain name registered with register.com, you get personalized email,
a customized 3 page Web site, free URL forwarding, and more!
A TERRIFIC VALUE.
Comparable packages* will cost you much more at other registrars!
Network Solutions: $129 NameSecure: $64.95 Registrars.com: $59.95
Please click the link
below each domain name to renew your registration.
<domainname>
https://secure.register.com/renewals/?_crypt_=7494875e5e7e7e6818c81948a84f63
74f7adf84728487d8a819398483938483e
If you'd like to proceed
with your transfer, please use the reply link(s) below to confirm
your intention. Click on each link or copy and paste into your browser
window. If you do not confirm by March 31, 2001 5:00 PM EST, the
transfer will not be completed. In the event that this occurs, you
will need to reinitiate the transfer through the registrar to which
you wish to transfer.
<domainname>
http://www.register.com/trans/?crypt=7494875e5e7e7e6818c81948a84f6374f7adf84
728487d8a819398483938483e
If you have any further
questions, please contact register.com.
*Products and services
contained in different registrars' domain name packages may vary.
Customer Support register.com,
inc. http://www.register.com
--- End Transfer Acknowledgement
Request Sample from register.com ---
Tucows observes that this
process is as confusing as Register.com can make it. There is no authority
for the process, for the time limit within the process, or for the many
blandishments not to quit Register.com.
Remedies
Tucows respectfully requests
that Verisign
- Find Register.com in
violation of the letter and spirit of the terms of Exhibit B of
the Registrar License and Agreement;
- Immediately Require
Register.com to be in compliance with the terms of the Registrar
License and Agreement;
- Immediately require
Register.com to desist from imposing the additional and irregular
authorizations complained of in this letter;
- Further require Register.com
to desist from engaging in any similar vexatious, anti-competitive
and unjustified behaviour that contravenes the RLA;
- And should Register.com
fail to comply with the instructions of Verisign in this regard,
terminate the Agreement with Register.com for cause as provided
by section 6(1)b.
The whole respectfully submitted
by,
Ross Wm. Rader
Director, Innovation & Research
Tucows Inc.
cc; Dan Halloran, Chief Registrar
Liaison, ICANN
Jack Kerins, Vice President, Customer Service, Register.com
Brenda Lazare, General Counsel, Tucows
Timothy Denton, External Counsel, Policy, Tucows
Elliot Noss, President & CEO, Tucows
Tucows Reseller Discussion List
Comments
concerning the layout, construction and functionality of this site
should be sent to webmaster@icann.org.
Page Updated
27-Aug-2001
(c) 2001
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
All rights
reserved.
|