Logo
ICANN
ICANN
Filtered Search

Are you sure you want to sign out from http://www.icann.org?

If you want to sign out from both http://www.icann.org and ICANN Account, click here.

Public Comment

Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.

Name: Michael Bauland
Date: 26 Apr 2024
Email: michael.bauland@knipp.de
Original Public Comment: Phase 2 Initial Report of the EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names
Are you providing input on behalf of a group (e.g., ICANN community group, organization, company, government)?
No
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 1
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Implementation Guidance 2.
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 3
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 4
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 5
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 6
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Implementation Guidance 7
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 8
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 9
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 10
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 11
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Implementation Guidance 12
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 13
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 14
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Implementation Guidance 15
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 16
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Implementation Guidance 17
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 18
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Implementation Guidance 19
Support Recommendation as written
Please indicate your response to Preliminary Recommendation 20
Support Recommendation as written
Other Comments

C6 EPDP Team Response (pages 63, 64)

In the end it says "As the EPDP Team agreed to not recommend the machine-readable XML format as the required format for IDN Tables, guideline 6a is consistent with the EPDP Team’s agreement."

However, this is not the case, guideline 6a is actually inconsistent with the EPDP's response. The guideline states that RFC 7940 MUST be used, whereas the EPDP Team does not recommend the XML LGR format from RFC7940 as the mandatory format for IDN tables.



Summary of Submission

I found the one mentioned section (C6) to contain incorrect wording.