Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
| Subscribe: Newsletters & News Alerts | ICANN Blog | Public Comment
| Subscribe: Newsletters & News Alerts | ICANN Blog | Public Comment
Results of the First gTLD Registry Compliance Audit
30 June 2006
On 30 June 2006, ICANN completed its first gTLD Registry Compliance Audit. This audit was based on requirements contained in the Public Whois Specifications in ICANN's gTLD Registry and Sponsorship Agreements. Each registry's audit was individually tailored based on specific requirements in the relevant agreement (e.g., "thick" versus "thin" registry models)[1]. This audit was the first in a series of upcoming audits, published to ensure openness and transparency of ICANN's registry compliance program.
Background Information
In 2005, ICANN posted an outline for its Contractual Compliance Program to explain the purpose of designing a comprehensive compliance program and to lay out the elements necessary to ensure its success. The program encompasses a new staff function dedicated to ensuring a thorough audit of all parties on all areas enumerated in the agreements as ICANN performs routine compliance checks throughout the year.
The overall goal of the compliance program is to ensure that both ICANN and its contracted parties fulfill the requirements set forth in the agreements between the parties. In achieving this goal, ICANN intends to:
In accordance with the goals of the program, the proposed budget for the fiscal year 2006-2007 (http://www.icann.org/announcements/proposed-budget-2006-07-cln.pdf) provides that ICANN will expand the corporate compliance program, including the system for auditing gTLD Registry and Sponsorship Agreements and Registrar Accreditation Agreements. In addition, the 2006-2009 Strategic Plan emphasizes the necessity of a fully staffed and fully equipped compliance department (see http://www.icann.org/announcements/strategic-plan-22jun06.htm#challenges).
Compliance Audit Process
Preparation for the gTLD Registry Compliance Audit included advance notification to the registries and sponsors explaining what the audit would entail and alerting them to the two week auditing period from June 19- 30 2006.
The testing began with a random selection of three domain name records per gTLD to query, in order to check for availability of Whois service and display of required fields in the output. Following this, queries were performed on contact records, nameserver records, and registrar records, and these results checked for display of required fields. In testing for display of required fields, results for a given type of query tended to be repetitive within a TLD, making duplicative audits of a large sample size unnecessary. The explanatory terms and conditions provided with Whois results after querying a record were also reviewed to ensure compliance with each registry agreement.
The statistics provided below are based on results compiled from web-based[2] and port 43[3] lookups of data elements required in the Public Whois Specifications[4] of the registry agreements. Accuracy of the Whois information displayed by registries was not checked in testing for display of required fields.[5]
The following categories were tested:
At the conclusion of the audit, each registry or sponsor was given its results, an explanation of any areas in need of reform, and a deadline to respond. Prior to publication of these results, the registries and sponsors were offered an opportunity to submit initial feedback for improvement of the compliance program as it moves forward.
Audit Summary:
The table below shows the number of issues identified in each category.
|
Registries tested in each category |
Name of Category Tested |
# of reported issues (web-based) |
# of reported issues (port 43) |
|
14 |
Availability of Whois lookup service |
0 |
0 |
|
14 |
Domain Record Query |
6 |
5 |
|
14 |
Nameserver Record Query |
6 |
6 |
|
14 |
Contact Record Query |
5 |
3 |
|
14 |
Registrar Record Query |
9 |
9 |
|
14 |
Terms and Conditions |
3 |
3 |
|
Total Number of Reported Problems |
29 |
26 |
Registries and sponsors reported back that corrective action is being taken based upon:
The table below shows the number of issues that have been resolved to date.
ICANN will provide updates of problem areas corrected using subsequent tables to reflect problems that have been resolved.
|
Category Tested |
# of reported issues |
# of items resolved |
# of Items in process of resolution |
# of Items still pending |
|
Availability of web-based and Port 43 Whois service |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Domain Record Whois Output - Web-based |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Domain Record Whois Output - Port 43 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Nameserver Record Whois Output - Web-based |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Nameserver Record Whois Output - Port 43 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Contact Record Whois Output - Web-based |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
Contact Record Whois Output - Port 43 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Registrar Record Query - Web-based |
9 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
Registrar Record Query - Port 43 |
9 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
Terms and Conditions – Web-based |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Terms and Conditions – Port 43 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Total problems identified: |
55 |
13 |
20 |
22 |
As ICANN proceeds with the implementation of a standardized compliance schedule, the initial results from the gTLD Registry Compliance Audit and collective feedback from the registry community will serve to improve the procedures of the Compliance Program.
[1] Registries or sponsors have the ability to store Whois data for a domain name in two ways, "thin" or "thick." A thin domain record will contain the name of the registrar, nameservers, and term of the registration. A thick domain record will provide the above data as well as contact data associated with the registration.
[2] All of the registry operators provide a front-end web interface to allow user access to the Whois service (commonly known as web-based lookup).
[3] A protocol TCP Port 43 (commonly known as port 43 service is used to supply Whois information). This is an older protocol that provides a direct method of accessing information.
[4] Depending on the agreement, Public Whois specifications can either be found in Appendix O, Attachment 15, or Appendix S. See http://www.icann.org/registries/agreements.htm.
[5] There is no contractual requirement for registries to ensure accuracy of Whois data provided by registrars.